
A few of us took a moment to sit against Sit/Lie with the bust of Harvey Milk outside the board chambers minutes after the board voted 8-3 to defeat the ordinance.
Even moderate Bevan Dufty says he cannot support the law.
We won big today at the Board of Supervisors! Thanks so much to everyone who helped make it possible.
Back at the beginning of March when the Mayor first introduced the sit/lie ordinance, it was not clear if we had enough votes to defeat it. Since then we have done an outstanding job of turning the issue around. In the end, sit/lie received a mere three out of eleven votes at the Board. This is truly a testament to the work we’ve all done to get the truth out about this ordinance. We should be proud of what we’ve accomplished.
Perhaps the biggest story of the day was moderate supervisor Bevan Dufty’s speech and vote against sit/lie. While he was clear to acknowledge that some people in San Francisco believe the “system is failing” and that they were demanding action from the board, he said that he did not think sit/lie was the “San Francisco way” to address the problem. He noted that the problems people were frustrated with and which they had described at hearings before the public safety committee, were already infractions and that the sit/lie ordinance would not address them. He said he could not support something ”that on its face is going to have to be selectively enforced. … I’ve got to believe that we can do better than this law and do something that’s more meaningful for the public.”
While the mayor and columnist C.W. Nevius from the San Francisco Chronicle will try to blame the defeat of sit/lie on an out-of-touch Board of Supervisors, it was clear that sit/lie was defeated because it proponents failed to make a reasonable case for it. The fact that moderate Dufty, who usually votes with the mayor, voted against sit/lie shows that this is not an issue of a progressive board simply trying to obstruct the mayor.
David Campos noted again today that when he questioned Nicholas King from the mayor’s office of criminal justice and Deputy Police Chief David Cashman at the first hearing for the ordinance, neither could offer any evidence whatsoever that a citizen’s complaint was needed to enforce existing laws that address obstruction of sidewalks and other problem behaviors. In other words the main argument that sit/lie proponents have for their ordinance simply has no basis in fact and they admitted as much in a public hearing. Everyone who was present at that hearing — opponents and proponents alike — knew this to be true.
Rather than return to the committee to provide evidence at a second hearing, the mayor and the police department chose to avoid the embarrassing situation altogether by not showing up to the hearing at all.
So what happens next?
So first we should all take a moment to celebrate this important victory! But as we know, the mayor is going to put a sit-lie ordinance on the November ballot and in reality, the fight to defeat sit-lie is just beginning. We’re gearing up for the big fight and we will definitely need your help.
Please stay tuned for upcoming events. On the right side of this page you can sign up for email blasts. We’ll be announcing the next events very soon!