Tabitha Harmon has written a very interesting and revealing article for SF Engage, a “community engagement initiative” of the Public Press.
To gather opinons on the proposed sit/lie ordinance, she “spoke with people who interact daily with and see those living on the street [in the Haight], be they bartenders, baristas at local cafes, employees of local shops, police officers or those just those visiting Golden Gate Park for the weekend.”
In her conversations, she “did not come across anyone who fully believed in and supported this proposed ordinance, with all of them stating that the city would simply be sweeping the problem under a rug.” Though many folks were left “without a response” when asked to propose a “tangible solution to problems that they perceived existed on the Haight.
Perhaps her most fascinating interview was with a middle-aged male police officer patrolling Haight Street who went on the record saying he was against the ordinance saying it would be ineffective and that it would, most of all, be a distraction for officers (wow!):
To my surprise he also did not agree with it. He argued that it would indeed help clean up the main streets of the Haight district, however this change would simply be superficial: it would not actually solve the problem of the rising homeless population. He explained that there has recently been influx of officers to areas such as the Haight to deal with incidents involving homeless people, but that the influx is causing other areas to go without police officers, so these side areas, in the end, are going to experience more criminal activity and social unrest due to the lack of attention that these neighborhoods are receiving. He also brought to my attention that the few officers patrolling these under-patrolled areas are going to be at more of a risk when considering their own safety. The officer ended up stating that this ordinance would be more of a distraction for officers than anything, because it would shift the focus to chasing transient people away from main streets rather than responding to more dangerous crimes taking place elsewhere.
There you have it. Even the police officers in San Francisco are against this law!







Find events and add your own
Report from Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights that counters claims that Sit/Lie is needed by the SFPD